The lack of lower age limit aside, trying Cameron as an adult is considered by many as inappropriate. List of Cons of Juveniles Tried as Adults 1. If children do not even receive the same rights as adults in the first place, it makes no sense to try them in adult court. However, due to the imbalance of power between children and adults, not to mention between children and prison staff, sexual abuse of juveniles in adult prison is underreported; fewer than one in 10 of the juveniles surveyed reported their abuse. Fewer varieties of punishment In an adult court, criminals can only end up in prison, and even risk being given the death penalty. This brings me to my third contention. However, for all offenses except rape, the average prison time actually served was only about 27 percent of the sentence imposed, in some cases shorter than the possible sentence length in a juvenile facility.
Not only are juveniles at extreme risk of sexual and other abuse, which is inarguably unacceptable, they also get denied counseling and educational services they desperately need. Professor Palo Annino Florida State University expands: Oh, absolutely, I think we're immoral, ultimately as a nation. Many of them are aware of just how flawed the juvenile justice system is, and use that to their advantage. If the girls are tried in an adult court and found guilty, they could be in prison for the next 65 years. Every parent knows that punishing a child of 15 and a child of 5 won't be carried out in the same manner. Most juveniles, even those convicted as adults, are released while they are still young. Contention Two: The results of an adult offense and a juvenile offense are the same.
On most occasions, you'll find that the kids who have committed a crime are very young -- as young as 9 and 10. I ask for the Affirmative vote in this debate. He found that while there were no significant differences in the effects of criminal versus juvenile court processing for burglary offenders, there were substantial differences in recidivism among robbery offenders. So we change the rules of the game. While young people must be held accountable for serious crimes, the juvenile justice system exists for precisely that purpose. The trend began in the 1990s, when virtually every state expanded the rules under which could be charged as adults.
On the other hand, juvenile delinquents who commit a crime when they are very young, will most likely repress the memory of that crime, such that as the time of their sentence progresses, they will only have a vague recollection of the crime. Did these poor misunderstood criminals take pity on the people they shot, or stabbed, or raped? Brings justice to the victims Some offenses may be forgivable, but not for extreme crimes similar to what the Wisconsin girls committed. This further hinders their ability to rehabilitate after they are released. List of Cons of Juveniles Tried as Adults 1. While some believe that this a salient strategy, there are others who do not see the benefits. Protecting criminals because of their age derails the efforts of reducing criminal activities, loss of lives, providing justice to the victims and using it as a deterrent to further crime as they are likely to experience serious punishment. So throwing them in jail with adult offenders would take away any hope of rehabilitation.
An adult committing the same violent crime will receive a much harsher penalty, often years in jail, possibly a life sentence, with little or no chance of parole. The reason why this theory has come into the picture is that a crime is a crime, no matter at what age it is committed. No matter who commits it. In addition to the agreement that juveniles should be tried as adults is that it will not only make them understand the consequences of their action, but also deter them from committing any further crimes. The point is that while youths should be punished for their crimes, it should be done in a developmentally appropriate way. Moving on to their second contention, which talks about how rehabilitation is more effective than a traditional trial.
Should minors who commit violent crimes be tried as adults? Would you feel your son's brutal murder was vindicated if the two boys who killed your son, purely for fun, were taken to juvenile detention, received rehabilitative aid and released with new identities to live the rest of their lives with nothing but a faint memory of what they had done? If juveniles are given more lenient punishments, this does not discourage them from committing crimes in the future and may even bolster their belief that they can successfully get away with it. Worse, they are much more likely to suffer sexual abuse and violence at the hands of other inmates and prison staff. Most proponents of this ideal believes that age should not be a determining factor of the level of punishment to be imposed. If such rule is completely abolished, people would think twice before doing something that will send them to jail. There are different circumstances to every crime, and the Affirmative position is too narrow-minded to see that.
So, it makes sense that young people who go through the adult system are than those in the juvenile system to be re-arrested. Lastly, this argument is largely not topical to today's debate. There is no justice as long as victims of crime see their attackers or the attackers of their dead loved ones get away with committing crimes against them. Just because a child commits a crime does not mean that the crime is not committed, it does not mean that the victim didn't suffer. How will these minors handle different situations in an adult prison? It gives parents a message that they can take less responsibility. And the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 asserted that more likely to be sexually assaulted in adult prisons than in juvenile facilities, often within the first 48 hours of their incarceration.
Some people disagree and others agree. These setbacks are enhanced by the adult criminal record they receive, preventing them from important educational and employment opportunities in the future. These children lose more than their freedom when they enter adult prisons; they lose out on the educational and psychological benefits offered by juvenile-detention facilities. However, no matter how severe or appalling a crime may be, juveniles should not be tried as adults; the reason being that everyone should be granted the chance to learn from their… Juveniles should not be tried as adults , there are fourteen states that do not have an age limit towards children that have committed crimes that are considered more heinous. This is a scary fact because it shows how the boundaries are being more and more blurred for these young people. All of these consequences result in a disproportionate amount of youth in adult facilities ending up incarcerated again later in life, which. Child or adult, the criminal violated the law, and made another person s suffer greatly.