The North and South fought the Civil War because the South lived on slavery and could not live without it, the north on the other hand did not like slavery. Thus, many sharecroppers, both black and white, became virtual slaves to debt. Finally, in the last chapter in the section, the authors explain the effect that the war had on the South including how the end of slavery created and forced whites to reinforce their slavery with the new Black Codes and that the South gained victory by further industrializing and gaining a sense of unity. Lee for mismanaging his army. In the end there was a waning of the will to resist on the part of Southern white people, but that was tied directly to the performance of the Confederate armies in the field; more than once they seemed to be on the brink of putting together enough successes to make Northern people behind the lines unwilling to pay the necessary price to subjugate the Confederacy. The authors claim that the fragile sense of Confederate nationalism was the main cause for the Southern defeat during the Civil War. Nobody made a good living in the army.
The South had a much smaller army and navy which was a significant factor to why the North won. In time these things would tell on the battlefield, certainly on the broader level. In addition, the Confederate government imposed a variety of policies—including the draft, , and tax-in-kind—that drove up the cost of goods and created greater scarcity. Therefore once the tide of the Civil War turned in Northern favor, many Southerners did not have the resolve to withstand the North. Northern ships were surrounding the Southern ports and cutting them off from food, supplies, weapons, and other things they needed that they wanted to buy from Europe. Explanations for Confederate defeat in the Civil War can be broken into two categories: some historians argue that the Confederacy collapsed largely because of social divisions within Southern society, while others emphasize the Union's military defeat of Confederate armies. However, the South would have become much poorer as the years wentby.
The Anaconda Plan strategy remained essentially unchanged since Scott devised it in the first days of the war. After the bombardment of Fort Sumterin Charleston, South Carolina, President Lincoln called for 75,000volunteers to enlist for three months to help end the rebellion. Thelarge plantations maintained by slaves no longer existed, and theSouthern economy lost it's competitive edge when it came to cottonproduction. He could have joined before that. At the beginning Prospect of aid from Britain and France.
Davis The South lost because it had inferior resources in every aspect of military personnel and equipment. That is not to say the South had nothing to fight for, they most certainly did. The army and congress determined that they would not return escaped slaves who went to Union lines and classified them as contraband. While Northern superiority in numbers and resources was a necessary condition for Union victory, it is not a sufficient explanation for that victory. However, many of these criticisms could easily be applied to the North, had the outcome been different, and a simple superiority in resources is an insufficient explanation, when one considers the many examples in history, not least the American War of Independence, when a weaker defender has kept a far stronger attacker at bay.
The real reason for the civil war lies deeper within the political, economic and social differences between the North and South. Sherman, Philip Sheridan, George H. Many Interpretations The outcome of the war was decided by a complex mix of factors. If it had a more unified purpose and was more aggressive. And so, in that sense, victory for the South was ultimately an impossibility.
The main southern strategy was to defeat the attacking Union forces and force the northern states to negotiate. Why the South Lost the Civil War by Richard V. Merton Coulter, have argued the South lacked the will to win. The only way the South could have won would have been for Lincoln to decide to lose. This precipitated a collapse sooner than might have happened, undermining any chance that the Confederate government might eventually pursue a negotiated settlement.
Similarly, Grant destroyed the means of sustenance in Confederate Virginia in effort to further reduce Lee's fighting effectiveness. In the rest of the country, 45,000 miles were laid. His presidency was one of the triggers that initiated the war and was also responsible for the Union victory. In 1642 most people thought that King Charles would win the civil war, as he had won the battle of Edge hill, but unfortunately King Charles did not take advantage of this opportunity and marched to London. I believe it safe to say the South wanted to win.
The confederate states had almost no industry and infrastructure, they foolishly overlooked this asset thinking that cotton would always be king. However, many southerners were small-time yeoman farmers. They used many as laborers to support Union efforts and soon began to pay them wages. It was about keeping the country strong, united, and together as a nation. Under sharecropping, the farmer farmed land owned by someone else, and the two shared the profits. After the losses at Gettysburg and Vicksburg, the south had no real strategy for victory.
Grant by Lincoln and company. Traditional advantage in cavalry - most young Southerners could ride and shoot Officer class - the army was a more natural choice of career for sons of rural landowners than in the industrial North. The primary reason the Confederates did not have more success on the battlefield is that they developed only one really talented army commander, and that, of course, was Robert E. In their accounting, the end of the war came not because of internal divisions but because Union forces eroded the ability of Confederates to fight. The other is: Why did the South not only lose its bid for independence but also its bid to influence the terms under which reunion would take place? Johnston and Albert Sidney Johnston and Braxton Bragg and the rest in that company. Abolition had advanced elsewhere in the world making it awkward for European politicians to back the Confederacy. His recent book, The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery, was awarded the Pulitzer Prize, the Bancroft Prize, and the Lincoln Prize.