The electoral college means that states elect the president, not the people. Furthermore, previous generations of Americans — all under the electoral college system — consistently recorded high voter turnout in presidential elections. Of all the provisions of the federal Constitution, the electoral college system was the most unrealistic—the one provision not based solidly on practical experience and precedent. There would be virtually no incentive to try to mobilize constituencies, organize specific interests, or devote any resources to such things as voter registration and education. Their argument is that, since each State is entitled to the same number of electoral votes regardless of its voter turnout, there is no incentive in the States to encourage voter participation. Representatives in each State e. That way, there would be no question about which party was responsible for policy.
I think it favors voters in swing states, and the fact that presidential candidates spend most of their effort in swing states is evidence of that. Because a constitutional amendment has not been passed. Because it is an archaic system that has created numerous issues for our democratic nation. The Current Call for Change Although groups like the League of Women Voters have long supported the abolition of the electoral college, 1 the protracted proceedings in Florida as well as the apparent disparity between the popular and the electoral college vote have further fueled calls to abolish the electoral college. What constitutes a material change will be determined at our sole discretion. Alexander Hamilton, The Papers of Alexander Hamilton, 1800-1802, Harold C.
If a presidential candidate receives an absolute majority of electoral votes, that candidate becomes the President and will be sworn into office on noon, January 20th. You might ask: Why does none of the save states adapt the new policy? In the election, George Washingtonreceived all 69 electoral votes and was unanimously electedpresident. Examples: California has 55 of 538 Electoral votes. Last, but certainly not least, the Electoral College needs to be abolished simply because our. Not much later, in 1790, there were 681,777 slaves in the United States as well as a number of free non-whites lacking the right to vote. If a candidate only needed a simple majority they may only campaign or try to appease larger states or regions of the country.
Would abolishing the electoral college magically have raised the participation in these States to 100 percent? This is because under an Electoral College voting process, an individual vote is only as valuable as its ability to influence the majority vote of a state. Bush was subsequently inaugurated as President of the United States with 271 electoral college votes as compared to Gore's 266. Imagine the problems that would arise, tensions that would exist, and the claims of illegitimacy likely to follow if the entire nation had to be counted, and then recounted to ascertain the results of the election. The result is that in 1988, for example, the combined voting age population 3,119,000 of the seven least populous jurisdiction of Alaska, Delaware, the District of Columbia, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming carried the same voting strength in the Electoral College 21 Electoral votes as the 9,614,000 persons of voting age in the State of Florida. Rather than retaining the Congressional system that we have and electing the president by popular vote, I would rather move towards the parliamentary system and let the administration reflect the composition of Congress.
The disproportionate impact of small states comes into play because they shift the median state and thus the median voter disproportionately, even if they themselves are far to the left or right of the median state. Still, if the prospect of a faithless elector is so fearsome. There are two reasons why safe states present a problem. The political parties in eachstate choose slates of potential Electors sometime before thegeneral election. John Quincy Adams, The Jubilee of the Constitution.
If any provision of these Terms is held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court, the remaining provisions of these Terms will remain in effect. One day, some day, we should take a little time to realign our system with our ideals. Being a third party candidate finished you. The products or services available on our Service may be mispriced, described inaccurately, or unavailable, and we may experience delays in updating information on the Service and in our advertising on other web sites. Because of the constitutional origins of the college, electors cannot be punished for this.
It's also why it left alone the issue of slavery within individual states, and why a majority of states going into the Civil War believed that they had a right to secede. In part, it was established to make every citizen and every state feel accounted for and important in a federalist government. This would mean that the northern states would dominate in the election of President. The validity and necessity of the Electoral College has been questioned approximately since it was formed in the Constitution. That is, a presidentialcandidate could in fact win a popular majority and yet still notwin the presidency.
This is part of the Issues for Trump and America. How one feels about the Electoral College is largely determined by whether one believes that the federal government should be a federal government, or should be an integrated state. If the political system of America were to become a democracy or republic, an electoral college would have no relevance. This issue was mentioned above and is discussed at greater length below. House of Representatives, Hearing on H. While this is certainly not true in every situation, it is an accurate statement when looking at the big picture.
Our needs, however, have changed and we need a system that is better equipped to handling those changes. Of course, countries withmulti-party systems also mostly have parliamentarian executiveswithout fixed terms of office, so they are difficult to compare. Nor would a direct election have changed those outcomes without a run-off requiring over 50% of the popular vote an idea which not even proponents of a direct election seem to advocate. We see in the recent election that the Presidential preferences of voters in some states, California being the best example, count less than the preferences of voters residing elsewhere. The way a winner is found in most every level of professionalism high school government elections, mayoral elections, even governor elections is by counting the votes and the candidate with the most, wins. Although this is not likely to happen, it is a situation that can be quite tricky for House members. And that's not my opinion, look it up, that is basically all electoral college is.
What the fuck is wrong with us? Thus, there is an incentive for presidential candidates to pull together coalitions of States and regions rather than to exacerbate regional differences. We cannot and do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information, including prices, product images, specifications, availability, and services. Ithica: Cornell University Press, 1975. Fisher Ames, Works of Fisher Ames Boston: T. Similarly, the sparsely populated agricultural regions feared an inability to protect their interests against the fishing and shipping industries dominant in the more populous coastal States. Opponents of the electoral college also argue that electors are free to ignore the popular will and vote for a different candidate than the one chosen by the people she represents. States also conduct other elections for U.